Skip to content

Having been strongly in favor during 2021 and 2022, stocks across the electric vehicle (EV) supply chain have faltered in 2024, as the previously inexorable-seeming EV transition appears to have hit a bump in the road. Two years ago, the favorable backdrop for stocks across the EV ecosystem gave rise to inflated valuations. Since then, however, valuations have declined significantly as growth expectations have been tapered back, interest rates have risen, margins have come under pressure, and earnings estimates have been revised down accordingly.

The news flow over the past 18 months has made for bleak reading for near-term EV prospects. A slowdown in demand, as illustrated by images of vast fields of unsold electric cars on the outskirts of Hangzhou and other Chinese cities,1 along with some high-profile policy moves, such as the UK government’s decision to postpone its target of banning new petrol car sales from 2030 to 2035, have given investors pause about the future of the EV market.

The impact of the apparent deterioration in demand can be seen at many points of the supply chain. In June 2024, one of the largest makers of battery materials warned of a rapid slowdown in demand growth for EVs and, as a result, cut its profit forecast on the basis that 2024 volumes for battery materials would be no higher than the previous year’s. This is the one of several developments so far this year to show the cascading effect of stalling EV sales growth across the industry’s supply chain.

According to recent data, global sales of fully electric cars are still forecast to grow in 2024 but at a slower rate than in the previous year—21% in 2024, down from a 28% pace in 2023.2 The slowdown is most pronounced in Europe.

Despite the fortunes for companies in the EV supply chain being weak in the short term, the valuations now look very attractive to us relative to their long-term earnings and growth prospects and further downside looks limited, in our analysis—exactly the circumstances that we like to buy these companies. We believe that the EV transition will likely continue, albeit at a slower rate than previously expected. The fundamental investment case underpinning most aspects of the EV supply chain—based upon continued technological advancements, regulatory support and growing environmental concerns—remains solid. Yet the market has cooled on many EV and EV ancillary stocks to an extent, which we believe may be an overaction to a negative near-term outlook.

In this piece, we look at a number of aspects of the EV supply chain, leveraging the insights of research analysts and portfolio managers in different parts of the world who are able to bring their understanding of local dynamics and industry specialisms to bear on a global theme.

Although a small number of countries in Asia are clearly most influential in EV production, the EV supply chain is truly global. It differs in several respects from the internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle equivalent. EVs may be mechanically simpler and contain fewer parts, but the nature of the technology makes mass production quite challenging. Battery production, the most expensive aspect of these vehicles, is overwhelmingly concentrated in East Asia. The raw materials used in producing lithium-ion batteries, however, are scattered globally. Lithium is mined primarily in Australia and South America, nickel in Indonesia and the Philippines, and cobalt in central Africa. After mining and production, these materials are sent to China, South Korea or Japan for refinement, processing, and cathode and cell production before being sent on to the EV manufacturer. Power semiconductors are mostly produced in East Asia and the United States. In terms of actual EV manufacturing, China remains the clear leader, but Europe and the United States are also home to some leading producers.

Complex, multifaceted supply chains as exist with EVs can best be analyzed by having a global and local presence. This allows for improved agility and speed in responding to emerging developments, while leveraging insights from other regions. It enables taking learnings from one market and applying those to another market, and in doing so, better understand the intricacies of a global supply chain.

For illustration purposes only. Map of GEG Office Locations and Analyst Coverage. Templeton Global Equity Group benefits from combining global with local when analyzing globalized industries like EVs.

Global autos: a view from Singapore, Ming Da Zhuang

Despite recent investor pessimism, the move toward electrification in the auto industry is not likely to slow down. In our view, the auto sector is developing into two distinct regions—China, now the world’s largest market, and global ex-China—progressing at different speeds.

China remains on track to exceed 70% EV adoption by 2030, having already achieved 40% EV penetration in April 2024. EV sales, including both fully battery-powered vehicles and hybrids, rose 18% in the first quarter of 2024 compared with the same period in 2023.3 This has been largely consumer driven as the Chinese market benefits from a wide range of affordable products. So, in our view, the story of slowing EV demand is not applicable to the Chinese market.

The pessimistic narrative is more prevalent in Europe and the United States. Teething issues with the technology, concerns about subsidies receding in places, inflation, and higher prices due to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) using higher specification batteries, have all contributed to a gloomier picture of faltering global ex-China EV demand. Germany’s decision in late 2023 to end its EV subsidy program, which had paid out 10 billion euros between 2016 and 2024, has been an important driver of the recent slowdown.

Nonetheless, there remains a strong regulatory push in Europe and the United States, which negates some of the bearishness on EVs in these regions. Several countries have targets in place for partial or complete bans on sales of new ICE vehicles—the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom and South Korea are among those countries targeting 2035 for the cessation of sales—while subsidies still exist. The regulatory landscape is such that OEMs will need to comply with tightening emission regulations in the United States and Europe and will thus be compelled to sell more EVs, thereby driving battery electric vehicle (BEV) adoption and penetration higher.

Additionally, innovations to reduce battery costs may be instrumental in improving the affordability of EVs. One of the reasons why EVs have been expensive relative to ICE vehicles is due to the cost of EV batteries, which contributes significantly to the overall vehicle price. Although battery costs have been declining, they are still a major expense. However, as many of the leading auto companies pursue plans to release newer, cost-effective models, we expect battery costs to fall. This should have a major bearing on the viability and affordability of EVs generally.

Global battery manufacturers: a view from Singapore, Clara Lee

The current weakness in demand for EV’s is cyclical and is the juncture where EV economics is tested as subsidies wind down. To enable EV’s to achieve cost parity with ICE vehicles, increasing the energy density of batteries and optimizing the manufacturing process is important, and this is where batteries make great partners for OEMs.

In our view, certain Korean battery makers have developed competitive advantages in battery chemistry and form factor flexibility, large scale manufacturing and supply chain integration, which are necessary for OEMs to structurally reduce the cost of EVs and make them affordable for the consumer. This process requires collaboration with a battery maker as optimization needs to occur from cell components all the way to the chassis. Manufacturing on a large scale with profitable yields is the additional hurdle many fail to surmount. 

In this space, we tend to favor tier 1 suppliers to major OEMs globally that possess large battery patent portfolios and have deep supply chain relationships up to the mine gate, which enables OEMs to meet trade regulations. Some OEMs aim to produce a significant share of batteries in-house over the next 5-10 years. However, developing battery cell and component technology is not easy, and scaling up in-house production is no easy feat, a key hurdle being failing to achieve the dry electrode method vs wet electrodes used by the industry.

Materials for the transition (lithium): a view from the United Kingdom, Craig Cameron

Many raw materials companies are critical to the energy transition. To reach net zero, we will need significant growth in the supply of metals such as copper, lithium, aluminum and nickel. Lithium is a key driver of the decarbonization of the transportation industry, with the metal forming a major component of all EV batteries, regardless of cathode chemistry. More than 90% of lithium demand now comes from the battery industry,4 and EVs remain the main source of demand growth going forward.

High EV-battery inventory levels and weakening expectations around EV sales led to share-price weakness through 2023, creating what we believe is a compelling long-term value opportunity in the lithium sector.

During 2023, spot pricing for lithium carbonate at 99.5% concentration (lithium carbonate equivalent or LCE) fell from more than US$75/kg to less than US$14/kg, with the price remaining in the range of around US$14-US$15/kg since then.5 While we acknowledge that lithium prices could continue to be volatile in the near term, we believe the market is now pricing in the current low lithium price into perpetuity, a scenario where we see meaningful shortages in supply as EV demand grows.

Today significant quantities of lithium can be extracted at low cost from brines in the “lithium triangle” of Chile, Argentina and Bolivia, or from a suite of relatively new technologies known as direct lithium extraction (DLE). However, marginal sources of supply are still coming from non-integrated hard rock mining of a product known as spodumene. This precursor to lithium hydroxide and lithium carbonate is used in EV batteries after it is sold to conversion facilities to produce these lithium products. We see spodumene as a significant source of incremental supply as the EV market grows. Our estimates suggest that prices are currently 30% too low to incentivize new supply of spodumene, and this discount is larger if alternative mined rocks are needed, such as lepidolite. Indeed, even the world’s largest spodumene project, the Greenbushes mine in Australia, is planning to lower production in response to weak pricing. Yet, in our opinion, supply growth remains crucial in a market that is still expected to see demand grow at 10%+ through the rest of the decade.6 Notably we expect demand from China and Europe, where regulation and subsidies remain supportive, to drive this growth.

As EV demand growth continues and high levels of inventories unwind, we expect lithium prices to rebound at least to incentive pricing. We also see a meaningful chance of medium-term price spikes, similar to 2022’s, on the back of ongoing price volatility. In such an environment we expect lithium equities to do well against lowered expectations.

Materials for the transition (aluminum): a view from Canada, Tina Sadler

Transportation is the largest end market for global aluminum, accounting for roughly 30% of total demand.7 The drive toward lighter vehicle construction has prompted increased demand for aluminum, with the silvery-white metal already replacing steel to some degree in traditional ICE vehicles. The light-weighting process can reduce transport emissions materially, on the simple concept that a lighter vehicle requires less power and thus less fuel. 

BEVs are generally 10%-15% heavier than their ICE counterparts, due to the weight of the battery pack and additional strengthening of the main structure to absorb increased crash loads. Thus, the light-weighting need is enhanced in the move to EVs. Bernstein Research estimates that EVs use 250 kg of aluminum on average compared to 172 kg in ICEs, with the increase driven by the need to offset the weight of large batteries and battery enclosures. Aluminum’s role in the light-weighting of the vehicle can also drive cost savings resulting from the ability to downsize the battery pack and drive-train components, while maintaining vehicle range.

In the face of increased regulations, there is enhanced focus on the CO2 footprint of a vehicle, not just during the use phase, but also from a total-cycle assessment perspective. As part of this, both regulators and vehicle OEMs have sharpened their focus on the CO2 footprint of raw materials used in the production process of the vehicle. The simple fact is that the average kilogram of aluminum produced globally today has a higher carbon footprint compared to the average kilogram of steel. However, given that aluminum is three times lighter, the comparison becomes less relevant as the weight savings compensate for the bulk of the difference.

The case for low-carbon aluminum is even more compelling as a superior alternative raw material for BEVs, as it allows for an emission reduction in both the production and use phases of the vehicle. This advantage starts at the first step of production, with automative research firm fka reporting an average estimated CO2 savings of around 15% vs. steel through the use of low-carbon aluminum where practically possible in the production process. 

Power semiconductors: a view from the United States, Peter Nori

Near-term market concerns regarding semiconductors relate to elevated inventories, weakness in EV sales, China softness and the ongoing correction in automotive and industrial end markets. Semiconductors stocks have underperformed for much of the period since mid-2023 on cycle concerns.

One leading manufacturer of the semiconductors used in automotive applications that we believe could stand to benefit from the ongoing green transition has 55%+ of revenues from power semis. Global EV penetration reached 13% in 2023, led by China at 25.6% and Europe at 18.1%8, while industry experts forecast EV/hybrid penetration rates to approach 50% by 20279 due to tougher emissions standards, subsidies and regulatory moves to ban ICE vehicles. The semiconductor content in EV and hybrid vehicles is similar and shifts in demand should be neutral, in our opinion.

We believe our thesis rests on the company’s positioning in semiconductors and sensors used to reduce power consumption and improve efficiency and safety in automobiles, industrial applications, solar and wind farms, and consumer devices. It is one of the leaders in fragmented markets, selling to customers under long duration contracts averaging seven years in autos and five years in industrial applications. Switching costs are high, particularly in automotive, due to lengthy qualification times, mission critical applications, software lock-in with MCU and low cost of chips relative to the price of the finished product.



IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice.

The views expressed are those of the investment manager and the comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as at publication date and may change without notice. The information provided in this material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region or market.

Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton Investments (“FTI”) has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. FTI accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from use of this information and reliance upon the comments opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole discretion of the user.

Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered outside the U.S. by other FTI affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulation permits. Please consult your own professional adviser or Franklin Templeton institutional contact for further information on availability of products and services in your jurisdiction.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.